Drawing on his interdisciplinary work in dental anatomy, geometry and human evolution, London-based dental surgeon Dr. Rory Mac Sweeney has proposed a brand new interpretation of the geometry behind Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man.
Historians and mathematicians have lengthy debated the that means of the well-known sketch, together with why da Vinci drew the person inside each a circle and a sq.—shapes whose centres don’t align.
The Fifteenth-century polymath, thought-about some of the good minds of the Renaissance, based mostly his proportions on the work of the traditional Roman architect Vitruvius, who wrote {that a} man’s peak ought to equal his arm span, amongst different ratios. Nevertheless, da Vinci subtly altered the determine to suit each shapes, making it extra anatomically and visually pleasing.
In a paper lately printed within the Journal of Arithmetic and the Arts, Mac Sweeney identifies a hidden equilateral triangle embedded inside the Vitruvian Man—a geometrical function he says is essential to understanding the drawing’s deeper construction and will assist crack a 500-year-old thriller.
“Leonardo’s drawing isn’t only a research in proportion—it’s a map of stress.” Mac Sweeney.
Learn associated article: Forensic Dentist Makes use of Experiences Decoding Homicide Proof As Inspiration For First Crime Novel
Learn associated article: Buffalo Dental College Featured in Netflix’s ‘Unsolved Mysteries’: Did That Head Belong to That Physique?
Hyperlinks to Bonwill’s Triangle
Sweeney connects this triangle to Bonwill’s Triangle—a dental idea first described within the nineteenth century that governs optimum jaw alignment and performance. He notes that the triangular construction recurs all through the human physique and is mathematically outlined by the ratio √8/3, or roughly 1.633.
“Leonardo’s drawing isn’t only a research in proportion—it’s a map of stress,” stated Mac Sweeney. “The 1.633 ratio seems within the jaw, the backbone and the cranium. It displays a state often called vector equilibrium, the place structural stress and compression are completely balanced. I consider this marks the ultimate step within the human journey towards full upright posture.”
That ratio, derived from the geometry of the cuboctahedron, is widely known in biomechanics and structure as a trademark of tensegrity—the stability of forces inside a steady kind. In response to Mac Sweeney, this geometry defines what he calls the “Vitruvian Morphotype”: a kind formed not by aesthetic beliefs however by evolutionary necessity.
“Nature solves gravity the best way it solves water. Vitruvian Man is the primary full sketch of what that answer appears to be like like.”Mac Sweeney.
‘Ratio could symbolize evolutionary omega level’
As people developed to stroll upright, Mac Sweeney suggests the 1.633 ratio could symbolize “our evolutionary omega level”—a structural threshold past which no additional adaptation is required to face, transfer or stability effectively in gravity.
He argues that fossil proof ought to reveal a gradual convergence towards this geometric configuration, notably within the jaw. One key second, he notes, is the looks of Class I occlusion—generally often called the overbite/overjet “step”—about 8,000 years in the past. Whereas variations nonetheless exist, he believes trendy Homo sapiens are the primary species to completely categorical the Vitruvian Morphotype.
“It’s just like the hydrodynamic type of a dolphin,” he stated. “Nature solves gravity the best way it solves water. Vitruvian Man is the primary full sketch of what that answer appears to be like like.”
Mac Sweeney means that da Vinci could have intuitively grasped rules of structural engineering centuries forward of their formal articulation. This provides new weight to the drawing’s legacy, putting it on the intersection of evolutionary biology, anatomical operate and mathematical design.
