The U.S. Federal Commerce Fee is warning employers — significantly massive health-care organizations and staffing companies — to assessment their noncompete and restrictive covenant agreements to make sure they don’t seem to be overbroad or unjustifiably restrictive.
FTC Chair Andrew N. Ferguson despatched letters to a number of health-care employers and staffing corporations on Sept. 10, urging them to look at their contracts. The company emphasised issues about restrictive agreements that would restrict employee mobility or affected person selection, particularly in rural communities the place entry to care is already restricted.
“Enforcement towards unreasonable noncompete agreements stays a high precedence for the Federal Commerce Fee,” Kelse Moen, deputy director of the Bureau of Competitors and co-chair of the company’s Joint Labor Job Power, mentioned in a press release. “We strongly encourage all employers — not simply these receiving letters at present — to assessment their contracts intently, to make sure that any restrictions on worker mobility are in full compliance with the regulation.”
Associated: Can your affiliate arrange store throughout the road and solicit sufferers and employees?
Associated: Are DSOs right here to remain? Right here’s what dentists must know
FTC’s authority to research
The FTC mentioned it has authority beneath Part 5 of the FTC Act to research unfair strategies of competitors, together with unjustified or overbroad noncompetes. The warning follows current enforcement actions, similar to an order requiring the nation’s largest pet cremation firm to cease implementing noncompetes, releasing about 1,800 employees. The Fee additionally launched a public inquiry earlier this yr to collect enter that would form future enforcement.
The outreach comes days after the FTC voted 3–1 to withdraw its appeals and settle for court docket rulings that struck down a nationwide rule banning most noncompete agreements. On Sept. 5, the company moved to dismiss its appeals after a Texas federal court docket dominated the FTC exceeded its authority in approving the rule, calling it “arbitrary and capricious.”
The American Dental Affiliation famous the FTC’s choice means the proposed ban — which might have affected an estimated 30 million U.S. employees — is not going to take impact. The ADA suggested employers and clinicians to proceed monitoring state legal guidelines, as many states have enacted their very own restrictions on noncompete agreements.
“This doesn’t remove the chance that the FTC might search to enact a extra slender rule sooner or later,” mentioned Michael Kim, J.D., ADA affiliate basic counsel.
